Skip to main content
Architecture

RE2020: low-carbon LCA redesigns architectural conception

With Ic Construction and Ic Énergie thresholds tightening in 2025 and 2028, carbon becomes a site-plan constraint as much as light or structure.

Équipe SwoftPôle veille sectorielle
Plan d'architecte avec calculs d'analyse de cycle de vie carbone

France's RE2020, in force since 1 January 2022, lives its second wave of tightening. The Ic Construction threshold, the carbon impact of the construction phase across the whole building lifecycle, falls from 640 kg CO₂eq/m² in 2022 to 530 kg in 2025, then 415 kg in 2028. For an architecture firm delivering collective housing, this is no longer an administrative compliance topic, it is a design constraint that redefines material, envelope and structural-system choices.

What LCA at concept stage really changes

The Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) defined by RE2020 requires computing the building's carbon footprint over 50 years, summing: construction (materials, transport, on-site work), operation (consumed energy), maintenance (forecast renovations), and end-of-life (demolition, recycling). Environmental and Health Declaration Sheets (FDES) act as the database, supplier product sheets validated by the INIES program.

The moment when LCA becomes decisive is no longer DCE (tender phase), it's APS (preliminary design). At APS stage, the architect makes structural choices (concrete, wood, hybrid, steel) that drive 40-60% of Ic Construction. When LCA is calculated only at DCE, it is too late to reverse without redoing the plan.

The silent problem: missing FDES

On a typical project, 60-80% of materials find their FDES in the INIES base. The rest, hardware, specific finishes, rare equipment, has no dedicated FDES. RE2020 provides a "penalized default value" (DED) mechanism that heavily penalizes the calculation. Result: a project that would have passed the threshold with precise FDES gets rejected on default values, and the architect must tweak around the edges to fit.

Thermal engineering offices that subcontract LCA bill on average 8-15 person-days per collective-housing project, and this load grows because BET firms are saturated. For agencies that internalize, the stake is to avoid running 3 LCA calculations during a project (one for APS, one for DCE, one for DOE).

Three levers few agencies exploit

Structural reuse

RE2020 recognizes reuse with a near-zero carbon coefficient (only transport and re-installation are counted). On a refurbishment project, keeping an existing structure rather than demo-rebuild can save 100-200 kg CO₂eq/m². But this requires a resource diagnostic done upstream by a specialized firm, and that step isn't in the standard architect contract.

The E+C- label as a head start

The experimental E+C- label (positive energy, carbon reduction) preceded RE2020. Many agencies have E+C- C2-level references, exactly the Ic 2028 level. The competence already exists in some teams, but it isn't tracked as a commercial advantage in tender responses.

Valued bio-sourced carbon

Wood, straw, hemp store carbon during the building's life. RE2020 values this storage in the LCA (simplified dynamic method). A timber-frame project can show a negative Ic Construction, a strong argument for public clients who have their own CO₂ targets (local authorities, social-housing operators committed to CSRD).

The 2026-2028 scenario for firms

The 2025 Ic Construction threshold (530 kg) is passable with low-carbon concrete and an optimized envelope. The 2028 threshold (415 kg) tips most projects toward integrating wood or bio-sourced materials on a significant share. Agencies that want to stay competitive on public tenders and private development will need to: (1) integrate LCA from APS, (2) build an internal library of validated FDES, (3) track design choices by their carbon footprint, and (4) document variant comparisons.

What changes the profession is that the architect no longer just "delivers" a compliant project, they document their carbon reasoning, and that reasoning becomes a piece of the DOE.

Sujets abordés

  • RE2020
  • ACV
  • Carbone
  • FDES INIES
  • Conception bas carbone

À approfondir dans le glossaire

Tech translation

How Swoft turns this challenge into software

Industrialiser l'ACV au stade APS, c'est connecter le BIM, la base FDES INIES, et le moteur de calcul carbone dans un flux unique. Voici comment Swoft équipe les cabinets d'architecture pour transformer la RE2020 en levier de conception, pas en frein administratif.

  1. 01

    Calcul carbone en temps réel sur la maquette BIM

    Chaque modification du modèle (ajout d'une cloison, changement d'isolant, choix d'un revêtement) recalcule l'Ic Construction en quelques secondes. L'architecte voit immédiatement l'impact d'un choix sans attendre le rapport BET. La bibliothèque FDES interne enrichit la base INIES avec les produits fréquemment utilisés par l'agence.

  2. 02

    Bibliothèque FDES partagée et tracée

    Les FDES validées au cours des projets précédents sont capitalisées dans une base interne, avec date de validité, fournisseur, contact technique. Les variantes (béton standard / béton bas carbone / béton recyclé) sont comparées en un clic, avec leur impact carbone et leur impact économique.

  3. 03

    Documentation automatique du raisonnement carbone pour le DOE

    À la livraison, le rapport de conception carbone est généré automatiquement : choix structurel et son impact, variantes étudiées, FDES retenues, écarts par rapport au seuil RE2020. Ce rapport accompagne le DOE et constitue la pièce qui répondra aux exigences CSRD du maître d'ouvrage.

Industry solution

Custom software for the Architecture industry

Discover how Swoft delivers tailored applications for architecture companies, methodology, integrations, ROI examples.

Explore Architecture solutions
Editorial proximity

Continue reading on this topic

  • Tracfin for fiduciary lawyers: the legal privilege paradox
    Cabinet d'avocats avec dossiers et analyse de conformité LCB-FT
    Cabinet d'avocats

    Tracfin for fiduciary lawyers: the legal privilege paradox

    French lawyers have been subject to AML obligations since 2004, but practical adoption remains hesitant. Bar association controls intensify, and digital compliance becomes unavoidable.

  • REP PMCB 2026: how the sanctions change for French construction firms
    Chantier de construction avec bennes de tri pour la filière REP Bâtiment
    BTP & Chantier

    REP PMCB 2026: how the sanctions change for French construction firms

    Three years after the launch of the French construction REP scheme, controls are intensifying. Decoding what awaits craftspeople and general contractors in 2026.

  • Factur-X / PDP: the 2026 schedule seen from the accounting firm
    Bureau d'expert-comptable avec écrans de saisie et factures dématérialisées
    Cabinet comptable

    Factur-X / PDP: the 2026 schedule seen from the accounting firm

    On 1 September 2026, large French companies must emit invoices in Factur-X via a PDP. For accounting firms, the real challenge is reception, not emission.